Skip to content

documaris — PIER71 Evaluation Criteria Mapping

  • Date: 2026-04-26 (updated from 2026-04-24)
  • Innovation Opportunities applied for: PIER71-11 (primary) · PIER71-02 (secondary) · PIER71-20 (dark-horse)

This document maps each of the 10 deck evaluation criteria from the PIER71 SPC Accelerate 2026 application form to the relevant sections of the documaris documentation and demo.


Criteria map

# Evaluation criterion Where documaris addresses it Key evidence
1 Severity & Urgency ref-background.md — The problem 140,000+ Singapore vessel calls/year; port detentions cost US$50,000–500,000; manual re-keying is the norm across all four comparison platforms
2 Market Size & Growth ref-background.md — Market sizing Singapore SAM: SGD 3.6M–7.0M/year (1,000 ship agents × SGD 300/month subscription, or 140,000 calls/year × SGD 50/call). TAM: IDP US$43.92B by 2034 (33.6% CAGR); Maritime Software US$2.86B by 2035. SAM is conservative and Singapore-only; Phase 2 (Japan, additional ports) expands it.
3 Competitive Advantage ref-background.md — Four core differentiators + Competitive Evidence Matrix Evidence Matrix records review date and finding ("not stated in public docs") for 3 representative platform categories (voyage management ERP, vessel compliance management, port agency operations). Four capability axes. PoC targets: creation time −56%, rework rate −50%, reported at M3.
4 Technology Maturity ref-architecture.md — full pipeline; roadmap/index.md — M0–M2 Core design defined; trust layer (BLAKE3, Ed25519) and data pipeline (Rust, DuckDB, WeasyPrint) are production-proven; AI model selection and local-processing delivery mechanism under review; R2 schema contract and PII boundary pending sign-off; live demo URL operational from M0 Day 1
5 Real-World Validation & Execution roadmap/index.md — M3 PoC measurement; ref-customers.md — validation plan M3 PoC: 20 sample Singapore port calls with ≥ 1 named Singapore ship agent; target creation time 32 min → 14 min (−56%), rework rate 18% → 9% (−50%), Regulatory Alert precision ≥ 90%; MPA Port+ pilot candidate identified by name at M3; measured values in poc/singapore_kpi_report.md
6 Operational Scalability ref-architecture.md — Data Fetch layer, Cargo Workspace Stateless pipeline reads from Cloudflare R2 (S3-compatible); DuckDB in-process query scales horizontally with no shared state; local processing path eliminates server load for crew PII forms
7 Industry Relevance of Business Model ref-background.md — Business model (Open Core); ref-customers.md — use case ranking Open 1 + Open 2 (MIT free) are the acquisition funnel that establishes trust with ship agents before the Commercial Singapore package is introduced — agents use the free FAL forms first, then upgrade to the Singapore subscription. Commercial Singapore (SGD 3.6M–7.0M SAM) aligns directly with MPA's Port+ digitalisation mandate and the 140,000 annual call volume. Japan is Phase 2 after Singapore pilot is validated.
8 IP & Defensibility ref-architecture.md — Trust Layer; Compliance Operations Policy (MVP) Cryptographic audit trail (BLAKE3 + Ed25519 + AIS voyage evidence) is a proprietary trust layer not replicable by form-filling tools. Compliance Operations Policy defines data classification, retention periods, role-based approval gates (confidence < 0.80, HIGH alert), audit log schema, and incident response SLAs — implemented as code, not a declaration, creating an auditable compliance posture that raises switching costs. Singapore regulatory KB is a maintained proprietary asset. OSS core increases network effects.
9 Domain Mastery ref-customers.md — use case ranking; ref-architecture.md — Layer 2 (field mapping) Field maps reflect IMO FAL Convention Annex field-by-field knowledge; regulatory KB seeded with real MPA Port Marine Circulars; AIS voyage evidence architecture reflects understanding of MPA's false-declaration enforcement concerns; arktrace → documaris integration closes the shadow fleet detection ↔ port compliance loop — a connection no competitor can replicate
10 Addresses selected Innovation Opportunities See IO alignment table below

Innovation Opportunity alignment

IO Title How documaris addresses it
PIER71-11 AI-Powered Port Call Documentation Core product: AI-assisted generation of FAL Form 1, FAL Form 5, and Singapore port entry package from indago vessel/voyage/cargo data; Regulatory Alert layer adds AI-powered compliance checking at generation time
PIER71-02 Managing Cybersecurity Risks and Incidences Natural Phase 2 extension via edgesentry-audit: crew PII processed locally — never transits the server; cryptographic document signing (Ed25519) and tamper-evident audit trail (BLAKE3 + append-only log) address document integrity and non-repudiation; aligns with IMDA TrustSG Authenticity + Integrity pillars; same trust layer already deployed for PIER71-11
PIER71-20 Fire Safety Management for Combustible Ship Cargo Dark-horse Phase 3 adjacent product: NLP manifest screening for LIB misdeclarations using the same arktrace text-analysis pipeline; IMO IMDG Code 42-24 mandatory from January 2026 creates immediate regulatory urgency; Hakata Port RORO terminal (EV imports) and Kitakyushu hazardous goods terminal provide Japan-side pilot demand

Notes on notation

External PIER71 challenge documents (available at pier71.sg/smart-port-challenge-2026) use the notation PIER7-02 for the cybersecurity opportunity. This proposal uses PIER71-02 throughout for consistency with the numbering convention applied to all other opportunities (PIER71-01, PIER71-10, PIER71-11). Both refer to the same innovation opportunity: Managing Cybersecurity Risks and Incidences.


See also: ref-background.md · ref-architecture.md · roadmap/index.md