documaris — PIER71 Evaluation Criteria Mapping
- Date: 2026-04-26 (updated from 2026-04-24)
- Innovation Opportunities applied for: PIER71-11 (primary) · PIER71-02 (secondary) · PIER71-20 (dark-horse)
This document maps each of the 10 deck evaluation criteria from the PIER71 SPC Accelerate 2026 application form to the relevant sections of the documaris documentation and demo.
Criteria map
| # | Evaluation criterion | Where documaris addresses it | Key evidence |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Severity & Urgency | ref-background.md — The problem |
140,000+ Singapore vessel calls/year; port detentions cost US$50,000–500,000; manual re-keying is the norm across all four comparison platforms |
| 2 | Market Size & Growth | ref-background.md — Market sizing |
Singapore SAM: SGD 3.6M–7.0M/year (1,000 ship agents × SGD 300/month subscription, or 140,000 calls/year × SGD 50/call). TAM: IDP US$43.92B by 2034 (33.6% CAGR); Maritime Software US$2.86B by 2035. SAM is conservative and Singapore-only; Phase 2 (Japan, additional ports) expands it. |
| 3 | Competitive Advantage | ref-background.md — Four core differentiators + Competitive Evidence Matrix |
Evidence Matrix records review date and finding ("not stated in public docs") for 3 representative platform categories (voyage management ERP, vessel compliance management, port agency operations). Four capability axes. PoC targets: creation time −56%, rework rate −50%, reported at M3. |
| 4 | Technology Maturity | ref-architecture.md — full pipeline; roadmap/index.md — M0–M2 |
Core design defined; trust layer (BLAKE3, Ed25519) and data pipeline (Rust, DuckDB, WeasyPrint) are production-proven; AI model selection and local-processing delivery mechanism under review; R2 schema contract and PII boundary pending sign-off; live demo URL operational from M0 Day 1 |
| 5 | Real-World Validation & Execution | roadmap/index.md — M3 PoC measurement; ref-customers.md — validation plan |
M3 PoC: 20 sample Singapore port calls with ≥ 1 named Singapore ship agent; target creation time 32 min → 14 min (−56%), rework rate 18% → 9% (−50%), Regulatory Alert precision ≥ 90%; MPA Port+ pilot candidate identified by name at M3; measured values in poc/singapore_kpi_report.md |
| 6 | Operational Scalability | ref-architecture.md — Data Fetch layer, Cargo Workspace |
Stateless pipeline reads from Cloudflare R2 (S3-compatible); DuckDB in-process query scales horizontally with no shared state; local processing path eliminates server load for crew PII forms |
| 7 | Industry Relevance of Business Model | ref-background.md — Business model (Open Core); ref-customers.md — use case ranking |
Open 1 + Open 2 (MIT free) are the acquisition funnel that establishes trust with ship agents before the Commercial Singapore package is introduced — agents use the free FAL forms first, then upgrade to the Singapore subscription. Commercial Singapore (SGD 3.6M–7.0M SAM) aligns directly with MPA's Port+ digitalisation mandate and the 140,000 annual call volume. Japan is Phase 2 after Singapore pilot is validated. |
| 8 | IP & Defensibility | ref-architecture.md — Trust Layer; Compliance Operations Policy (MVP) |
Cryptographic audit trail (BLAKE3 + Ed25519 + AIS voyage evidence) is a proprietary trust layer not replicable by form-filling tools. Compliance Operations Policy defines data classification, retention periods, role-based approval gates (confidence < 0.80, HIGH alert), audit log schema, and incident response SLAs — implemented as code, not a declaration, creating an auditable compliance posture that raises switching costs. Singapore regulatory KB is a maintained proprietary asset. OSS core increases network effects. |
| 9 | Domain Mastery | ref-customers.md — use case ranking; ref-architecture.md — Layer 2 (field mapping) |
Field maps reflect IMO FAL Convention Annex field-by-field knowledge; regulatory KB seeded with real MPA Port Marine Circulars; AIS voyage evidence architecture reflects understanding of MPA's false-declaration enforcement concerns; arktrace → documaris integration closes the shadow fleet detection ↔ port compliance loop — a connection no competitor can replicate |
| 10 | Addresses selected Innovation Opportunities | See IO alignment table below |
Innovation Opportunity alignment
| IO | Title | How documaris addresses it |
|---|---|---|
| PIER71-11 | AI-Powered Port Call Documentation | Core product: AI-assisted generation of FAL Form 1, FAL Form 5, and Singapore port entry package from indago vessel/voyage/cargo data; Regulatory Alert layer adds AI-powered compliance checking at generation time |
| PIER71-02 | Managing Cybersecurity Risks and Incidences | Natural Phase 2 extension via edgesentry-audit: crew PII processed locally — never transits the server; cryptographic document signing (Ed25519) and tamper-evident audit trail (BLAKE3 + append-only log) address document integrity and non-repudiation; aligns with IMDA TrustSG Authenticity + Integrity pillars; same trust layer already deployed for PIER71-11 |
| PIER71-20 | Fire Safety Management for Combustible Ship Cargo | Dark-horse Phase 3 adjacent product: NLP manifest screening for LIB misdeclarations using the same arktrace text-analysis pipeline; IMO IMDG Code 42-24 mandatory from January 2026 creates immediate regulatory urgency; Hakata Port RORO terminal (EV imports) and Kitakyushu hazardous goods terminal provide Japan-side pilot demand |
Notes on notation
External PIER71 challenge documents (available at pier71.sg/smart-port-challenge-2026) use the notation PIER7-02 for the cybersecurity opportunity. This proposal uses PIER71-02 throughout for consistency with the numbering convention applied to all other opportunities (PIER71-01, PIER71-10, PIER71-11). Both refer to the same innovation opportunity: Managing Cybersecurity Risks and Incidences.
See also: ref-background.md · ref-architecture.md · roadmap/index.md